![]() ![]()
Nevertheless, in fairness of things, the IRPWM also states that. This facility in law available to IRSDC is of great essence, as the lack of it assails the capability of the private developers to secure approvals and execute the redevelopment efforts within strict timelines in order to maintain project IRRs. II of 1924 provide for the right to erect buildings on their own land by Railways without having to obtain sanction of the Municipal or Cantonment authorities in whose area the site is situated." IV of 1899 read in conjunction with Sec.291 of the Cantonments Act No. "Section 11 of the Indian Railways Act No.24 of 1989 and the Government Buildings Act No. #Indian railway station announcement ringtone download manual#UPSEB, 2001 etc.).Īccording to the Original Indian Railways Permanent Way Manual (IRPWM). Marriott vs Municipality of Howrah, 1940, The Municipal Corporation of Bombay vs the Great Indian Peninsular Railways, UOI Vs. This legal position has been established has stood the "pith and substance" test of Constitutional scrutiny and validity in multiple cases ( Subhash Dutta vs. Therefore, by virtue of this Act, the provisions of all other Acts except the 'land acquisition' Act stand muted, in so far as the intent and purpose of the said clause is concerned. The aforementioned section has a non-obstante clause, a legislative device that precludes all extant laws and supersedes them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |